| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 |
161. NEED HELP TO LOG ON TEST SERVER!! - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Originally by: Chi Quan u cant have 2 eve clients running at the same time, maybe that's the problem. i heared evelauncher can run two simulatniously. That is quite a misrepresentation of the truth. Or the 7 clients I had running...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.11 12:45:00
|
162. Invention Success since Rev 2 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Tunak Oh and to get back on subject with the invention stuff. People are now looking at corp/personal/POS differences. Did any of these things factor into success before the patch? For these to matter CCP would have to inte...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.11 11:32:00
|
163. Account Errors - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Remember to make a petition, people. Just posting in the forum is not the best way to wake them up.
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.11 09:34:00
|
164. Account Errors - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Having the same problem. Account expired and can't enter new CC information. Wakey, wakey, CCPey!
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.11 08:33:00
|
165. Invention Success since Rev 2 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Trak Cranker on 10/07/2007 23:09:34 Originally by: Lab Technician071548 A confidence interval (based on a probability, not a "factor") tells you how "good" your "answer" is or, in other words, how "close" "to" "the" "truth"...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.10 23:08:00
|
166. Visual Range? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Unaralas This gets rather annoying when fighting on a grid boundary. Rather confusing :) I've had a few fights in the corner of a grid - now thats just crazy. :) Impossible to figure out if you need to go up, down, left,...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.10 14:52:00
|
167. Showing off...Dont use me as an excuse... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
That post is one big example of how to shoot yourself in the foot.
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.10 14:46:00
|
168. wait a minute... was there a mirror? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: MotherMoon Edited by: MotherMoon on 09/07/2007 18:57:51 if there was a resent mirror you want cap ship in the test on the 10th but now one one has a cap ship... hmmm Just because you personally have only trained for...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.10 11:59:00
|
169. "Remedial steals goonswarm's.. " Doesn't help the game in the long run - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CrestoftheStars no they don't this is harashment and against the eula. Yes they do, and it isnt. Welcome to Eve.
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.10 10:30:00
|
170. Invention Success since Rev 2 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Lab Technician071548 That conclusion is of the form, "Either this result, based on samples, is true (or false, depending on test result) of the population or this sample is unusual." You are not allowed any conclusion ...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.10 00:22:00
|
171. When's the next Sisi Mirror? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Jita Alt We shouldn't need mirrors at all really, people who don't have their chars on sisi have new chars so they'd loose just as many SP as we do if they have to make a new one And those of us who actually do test **** tr...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.09 20:28:00
|
172. The Great EVE 0.0 Survey - Results - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Callente Riveara But besides that, everything you said is spot on. 31 people gives you an appropriate spread of answers to be dubbed as "Random", no matter what the size of the total group of people are. Unless you can...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.09 19:54:00
|
173. Invention Success since Rev 2 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Trak Cranker on 09/07/2007 15:15:16
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.09 15:15:00
|
174. Invention Success since Rev 2 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Trak Cranker on 09/07/2007 15:14:24
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.09 15:13:00
|
175. Change "Approach" to "Align-to" when out of Approach Range! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP usually says that a lot of /signed dont impress them much, but more in detail debate does. But this idea is perfect, so simple and sufficiently described, so what is there really left to do, but go: /signed
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.09 12:56:00
|
176. Invention Success since Rev 2 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Mnengli Noiliffe however when people do hundreds of jobs and their rates fall, this is no longer probability, it is STATISTICS. which definitely means that chances have changed. Maybe you need to brush up on your stati...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.09 08:54:00
|
177. The Great EVE 0.0 Survey - Results - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Trak Cranker on 09/07/2007 08:43:44 Originally by: BluOrange If you're saying these results are not statistically significant, I'd like you to explain why... Well, given that the margin of error, for a standard 95% conf...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.09 08:43:00
|
178. Invention Success since Rev 2 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: TGR Reaper Originally by: Tunak Originally by: TGR Reaper interesting no ships 1 run and you are having way better success than i am. thats kinda weird that i put everything into it and get nothing even with ...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.08 23:44:00
|
179. test server: copying a BPO - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Trak Cranker on 08/07/2007 22:35:13 No facts are confused. I have bug reported this, and I believe it is fixed, but still in play on Sisi: http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=548114
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.08 22:35:00
|
180. Invention Success since Rev 2 - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Ricdic Realistically there is no number of tries that can base a real argument on. If I done 50,000 attempts today and got a 50% success rate, I could try 50,000 attempts tomorrow and have a 10% success rate. Without knowin...
- by Trak Cranker - at 2007.07.08 13:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |